Mess of "MEESHA" verdict

                                       

                                             Mess of "MEESHA" verdict

The Supreme court said the creativity and imagination of an author cannot be held hostage to the vagaries of subjective perception, whims and fancies of Individual.

With due respect to Supreme Court and the learned judges, I would love to understand following

     

   My lord, art and literature belong to subjective domain, how  can I or you have an objective opinion on it?

   My lord, if judges are really so objective in taking decisions,how does one bench overturns verdict of another?

  Your honour, creativity does not know boundaries, under such a situation, while giving shape to free flowing thoughts,

If a writer lands up degrading Indian Tricolour,

If a writer lands writing a sensuous story on “Nyay ki devi (blind)” and the Judges, depicting every minute details,

If a writer lands writing a love story on “pro phet” and “Mari am” ,

will you treat him in the same manner, will the society, will the nation treat him in the way shown by you or you will have some other perception based justification to award punishment to such writer?

Your honor, we all respect FOE, we all respect creativity, we all respect art and literature but one thing must be kept in mind that perception cannot be out rightly ignored.

Disclaimer: This write up has no intention to hurt feelings of any person or organization or community. Some hypothetical situations were created to clear the point.

Jai hind

NOTA:महाजनों येन गताः स पन्थाः

महाजनों येन गताः स पन्थाः 

“NOTA” the elementary stage of power to reject. I don’t believe in power to reject but I believe in power to create, create a society where quality prevails, create a society where quality is defined as protector of down trodden, create a society where quality works for the betterment of not so qualified, create a society where quality respects ignored and left out people, create a society where quality takes an extra mile to make others equally qualify.

“NOTA”, Reservation and SC/ST Act will not bridge the gap, it may satiate the ego of one or the other group.

No divisive legislation can bring inclusivity, no partisan patron can promote nationalism.

Time has come to stand united and prove that political science is not above social science.

Social institutions are more important than political institutions and will remain so forever.

It will be in right taste to mention that all political parties and stake holders may align their priorities keeping social and nation interest on top most priority.